Firm Client Defeats Blue Cross Motion To Dismiss, Health Insurer’s Offset Practices At Issue
March 2020 | NewsOn March 24, 2020, a Minnesota federal district court judge adopted a magistrate’s report that recommended that a firm’s client’s case that challenges the “offset” practices of Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota. The case, captioned J.P. and M.K. […]
MoreMagistrate Ruling Affirmed By Trial Judge
March 2020 | NewsOn February 28, 2020, the Trial Court adopted a Magistrate’s Recommendation that summary judgment be granted in part in favor of a firm client challenging his daughter’s denial of coverage at a residential treatment center. The ruling, in effect, finds […]
More“High Stakes” Honor
February 2020 | NewsI am honored to announce that I have been recognized among America’s Top 100 High Stakes Litigators® for 2020. Selection to America’s Top 100 High Stakes Litigators® is by invitation only and is reserved to identify the nation’s most exceptional trial attorneys in high […]
MoreMagistrate Recommends Finding That Could Invalidate Insurer’s RTC Exclusion
January 2020 | NewsIn L.P. v. BCBSM, Inc., No. 18-cv-1241 (D. Minn. January 17, 2020), a magistrate has recommended a finding that, if affirmed, could result in a finding that Blue Cross of Minnesota’s residential treatment center coverage exclusion violates the federal Parity […]
MoreWilderness Coverage Case Permitted To Proceed
January 2020 | NewsOn September 27, 2019, a Utah federal district court judge permitted an ERISA wilderness therapy Parity Act claim to proceed, holding that Plaintiffs had stated a claim that was, potentially, recoverable under the statute. In K.H.B. v. UnitedHealthCare Ins. Co., […]
More